Presented at the 2nd International Symposium on Innovative Approaches in Scientific Studies (ISAS2018-Winter), Samsun, Turkey, Nov 30, 2018

SETSCI Conference Proceedings, 2018, 3, Page (s): 842-847 , https://doi.org/

Published Date: 31 December 2018    | 1419     13

From the time that humans first started to live in a settled way, the effect of public places (as the common space for
the people from every section of the community) on communications with their surroundings, and the need to meet the main
requirements, have signs about the city, and improve the community’s conscious cannot be overestimated. People have deep
feelings about a place or feel themselves as part of the community when they are in contact with the environment and other
people. From this point of view public places, with the feature of being a life platform by creating the image of environment
and identifying the properties of community, are the residence of social-cultural activities. The aim of this research is to
identify the usage of art in public places, the different experiences that are presented to people and the role of art on improving
the quality of public places by recognising the contributions on physical and social interaction. Nowadays, many governments
are working to improve the environmental quality and the satisfaction about the places. The art activity in public space
arrangements, as well as the formation of space image and environmental identity, motivates the human behavior in the
environment and creates an aesthetic appeal in visual integrity.  

Keywords - Urban Identity, Art, Urban Public Space, Social Life, Environmental Image

[1] M. Erbay, Plastik Sanatlar Eğitiminin Gelişimi, Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul, 1997.
[2] E. Atabek, Kamusal Mekanlarda Kalite, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesinde Kullanıcı Görüşlerine Dayalı Kalite Değerlendirmesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İTÜ Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul, 2002.
[3] S. Ögel, Çevresel Sanat, İTÜ Mimarlık-Mühendislik Fakültesi, Yayınları, İstanbul, 1997.
[4] M. Parfect ve G. Power, Planning for Urban Quality: Urban Design in Towns and Cities, Routhledge Publishing, London and New York, 1997.
[5] J. Brand, Art for a Natural and Artificial Environment, Zoetermeer: Foundation World Horticultural Exhibition Floriade, 1992.
[6] D. Oktay, Kamusal Mekanda Sanata Güncel Bir Bakış, Yapı Mimarlık Kültür Sanat Dergisi 264, s.105-109, İstanbul, 2003.
[7] E. Karaaslan, Altkültürler ve Sokak Sanatı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Güzel Sanatlar Enstitüsü Resim Anasanat Dalı, İzmir, 2008.
[8] M. Aydoğan, Kent Kimliğinin Ortaya Çıkartılması Amacıyla Kentsel Tasarım Rehberlerinin Kullanımı Kemeraltı Örneği, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, İzmir, 2001.
[9] S. Eti, Çağdaş Sanat, İTÜ Yayını, İstanbul, 1971.
[10] N. Şenliyer, Yaya Mekanlarında Sanat Objelerinin Çevre Yaşam Kalitesine Etkisi: Paris’ten Bir MİA Örneği, Mimari ve Kentsel Çevrede Kalite Arayışları Sempozyumu, 5-6-7 Haziran, s. 133-139, İTÜ yayınları, İTÜ, İstanbul, 1995.
[11] S. Aydınlı, Kentsel Mekanda Estetik Algılama, Mimari ve Kentsel Çevrede Kalite Arayışları Sempozyumu, 5-6-7 Haziran, s. 320-327, İTÜ Yayınları, İTÜ, İstanbul, 1995.
[12] S. J. Longini, Public Art Contributes to City's Prestige, Defines İts Image, Oakland Tribune, 2006.
[13] J. Lang, Creating Architectural Theory: The Role of The Behavioral Sciences in Environmental Design, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1987.
[14] S. Carr, M. Francis, L.G. Rivling ve A.M. Stone, Public Spaces, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1992.
[15] J. Lang, Urban Design: The American Experience, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1994.
[16] N. Uygur, Kültür Kuramı, Yapı Kredi Yayınları, İstanbul, 1996.
[17] D. Kuban, Mimarlık Kavramları, İTÜ Matbaası, İstanbul, 1973.