Presented at the 2nd International Symposium on Innovative Approaches in Scientific Studies (ISAS2018-Winter), Samsun, Turkey, Nov 30, 2018

SETSCI Conference Proceedings, 2018, 3, Page (s): 1205-1209 , https://doi.org/

Published Date: 31 December 2018    | 1402     11

People has learned and has been developing agriculture for years. The surrounding land has become the best way to
use as a result of years of observations. Over the centuries, cities have grown significantly and observable changes in land usage
come up with the help of expanded and developing technology. Although Turkey has a large and suitable for agriculture ,
agricultural activities are gradually decreasing every year. The main reason why people of rural areas migrate rapidly to the cities
and why agricultural activities are decreasing can be explained with the lack of adequate productivity in the production layer;
moreover, fertile soils are not used effectively. As a result of low level of productivity on agriculture, the production of
agricultural products does not meet domestic demand.
Significant amount of funding is planned for future agriculture projects. Nevertheless, the agricultural development in Turkey is
still facing major obstacles due to efficiency. Nowadays significant inflation rate increase of Turkey can be observed. One of the
most important reasons for the serious increase in inflation is the efficiency and planning problems in agricultural items and
activities. This study aims to develop a detailed risk analysis model of whole system to increase productivity and efficiency with
multi criteria decision making methods (MCDM). At the end of study proposed risk analysis model aims to help all kinds of
agricultural products to be planned and to be produced with detailed scientific investigations.  

Keywords - Multi criteria decision making methods, Agriculture , Productivity , Risk analysis , Optimization

[1] Gul M and Guneri AF. 2016. A fuzzy multi criteria risk assessment based on decision matrix technique: A case study for aluminum industry. J Loss Prev Process Ind 40:89–100
[2] Guneri AF, Gul M, and Ozgurler S. 2015. A fuzzy AHP methodology for selection of risk assessment
[3] Ozdemir, Y., Basligil, H., & Ak, M. F. (2016). Airport Safety Risk Evaluation Based On Fuzzy Anp And Fuzzy Ahp. Uncertainty Modelling in Knowledge Engineering and Decision Making.
[4] Gul M, Celik E, Aydin N, et al. 2016. A state of the art literature review of VIKOR and its fuzzy extensions on applications. Appl Soft Comput 46:60–89
[5] Biswas, B., Lacey, J.R., Workman, J.P., and Siddoway, F.H. (1984). Profit Maximization as a Management Goal on Southeastern Montana Ranches. Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 9(1): 186-194.
[6] Gul, M., & Ak, M. F. (2018). A comparative outline for quantifying risk ratings in occupational health and safety risk assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 196, 653-664.
[7] “Faostat,” from http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/
[8] “TUIK” from http://www.tuik.gov.tr/
[9] “OECD” from from http://data.oecd.org/
[10] Stavrou, D. I., Ventikos, N. P., & Siskos, Y. (2016). Locating Ship-toShip (STS) Transfer Operations via Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA): A Case Study. Multiple Criteria Decision Making,137-163
[11] Aragon_es-Beltr_an P, Mendoza-Roca JA, Bes-Pi_a A, et al. 2009. Application of multi criteria decision analysis to jar-test results for chemicals selection in the physical–chemical treatment of textile wastewater. J Hazard Mater 164(1):288–95.
[12] Saaty TL. 1990. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 48(1):9–26 Tzeng GH and Huang JJ. 2011. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL