Presented at the 2nd International Symposium on Innovative Approaches in Scientific Studies (ISAS2018-Winter), Samsun, Turkey, Nov 30, 2018

SETSCI Conference Proceedings, 2018, 3, Page (s): 503-504 , https://doi.org/

Published Date: 31 December 2018    | 1355     10

Education systems are facing many challenges today. Information technologies and the nature of work have been
changing rapidly and redefining the concepts of training and workforce. Professions will evolve and some of the jobs we know
today will disappear in the near future. For that kind of a blurry future, in schools, teachers are expected to guide students to
develop a vision of their goals in life, build skills such as time management, self-advocacy, and academic & professional
development skills to achieve their goals. However, the approaches and methods being applied today in classes are not really
helping through the route to the future. For that, new approaches and methods have been of great interest to researchers, educators
and decision-makers. As a response to the needs of the era, heutagogy (self-determined learning) and coaching have been two of
the concepts with increasing interest upon. In this study, based on an extensive review of the current literature and research,
heutagogy and student coaching concepts are examined in an inter-related fashion as a suggested means through the route to
respond to the needs of the era of industry 4.0.  

Keywords - Heutagogy, student coaching, learning leader, industry 4.0, self-determined

[1] J. Gerstein. “Moving from education 1.0 through education 2.0 towards education 3.0.” in L.M. Blaschke, C. Kenyon, and S. Hase (eds.), Experiences in Self-Determined Learning. pp. 83-98, CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2014.
[2] L. M. Blaschke and S. Hase. Heutagogy: “A holistic framework for creating twenty-first-century self-determined learners” in B. Gros,Kinshuk, M. Maina, (eds.), The Future of Ubiquitous Learning Designsmfor Emerging Pedagogies, pp. 25-40, Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer, 2016.
[3] J. M. Shafritz and J. S. Ott, Classics of Organization Theory, 4th ed., New York: Harcourt Brace College, 1996.
[4] S. Mann, G. Ker, P. Eden-Mann, and R. O'Brien, “Designing for heutagogy: case study of an independent learning pathway approach,” Education - Scope: (Learning & Teaching), 4, pp. 24-38, 2017.
[5] L. M. Blaschke. “Heutagogy and lifelong learning: A review of heutagogical practice and self-determined learning”, The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(1), pp. 56-71, 2012.
[6] N. Canning. “Playing with heutagogy: exploring strategies to empower mature learners in higher education,” Journal of Further and Higher Education, 34(1), pp. 59-71, 2010.
[7] S. Hase and C. Kenyon. “Heutagogy: A child of complexity theory”, Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 4(1), pp. 111-119, 2007.
[8] J. Stoszkowski and L. McCarthy.“Who wouldn’t want to take charge of their learning?” Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 6(2), pp. 104-107, 2018.
[9] J. O’Connor and A. Lages, Coaching with NLP: How to be a Master Coach, London: Element, 2004.
[10] D.R. Parker and K. Boutelle. “Executive function coaching for college students with learning disabilities and ADHD: a new approach for fostering self-determination,” Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24(4), pp.204–215, 2009.
[11] R. A. Bomar. “The role of online academic coaching on levels of selfdetermination of college students with learning disabilities,” Dissertation, The Graduate School of the Texas Woman’s University, Denton, Texas, May, 2017.
[12] L. M. Blaschke. “Self-determined learning: designing for heutagogic learning environments”, in J. Elen and G. Clarebout (eds.) Learning, Design, and Technology. An International Compendium of Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, pp. 25-40, Heidelberg: Springer, 2016.
[13] E. L. Richman, K. N. Rademacher and T. L. Maitland. “Coaching and college success”, Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 27(1), pp. 33-52, 2014.