Beyin Cerrahisi Ameliyatlarında Antropolojik Farklılıkların Oluşturduğu Problemlerin Çözümünde İnovasyon
Murat Kiraz1*, Emre Demir2
1Sancaktepe Şehit Prof Dr İlhan Varank Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi , İstanbul, Türkiye
2Hitit Üniversitesi, Çorum, Türkiye
* Corresponding author: kirazmurat@gmail.com
Presented at the 3rd International Symposium on Innovative Approaches in Scientific Studies (Engineering and Natural Sciences) (ISAS2019-ENS), Ankara, Turkey, Apr 19, 2019
SETSCI Conference Proceedings, 2019, 4, Page (s): 35-40 , https://doi.org/
Published Date: 01 June 2019 | 783 14
Abstract
Bu çalışmada baş iskeletinde bulunan kemikler ve kraniometrik noktalar tanımlanarak beyin cerrahisi ameliyatlarında
antropolojik farklılıkların oluşturduğu problemlerin çözümündeki son gelişmeler incelenmiştir.
Keywords - Beyin cerrahi, antropometrik ölçümler, kraniometrik noktalar, inovasyon
References
[1] Tunçel N., Aydın S., Zeytinoğlu M., 2006 İnsan Anatomisi ve Fizyolojisi https://books.google.com.tr/ Sami Aydın (Ed), Kafa Kemikleri (s.48) Eskişehir
[2] Schünke, M., Schulte, E., Schumacher,U. Voll, M., Wesker, K. Prometheus 2006. Anatomi Atlası Mehmet Yıldırım, Tania Marur (Ed) Baş-Kafatası Kemikleri (s.3) İstanbul:Nobel
[3] Arıncı K., Elhan A. (2006). Anatomi. 4. baskı, 2. cilt. Güneş Kitapevi: Ankara.
[4] Ribas G.C., Yasuda A., Ribas E.C., Nishikuni K., Rodrigues A.J. Jr. (2006). Surgical anatomy of microneurosurgical sulcal key points. Neurosurgery. Oct;59(4 Suppl 2):ONS1 n-211
[5] Greenberg M.S. Nöroşirürji El Kitabı 6. Baskı 2013 H. Hakan Oruçkaptan (Ed) Yüzey anatomisi s.69 [6] D'Urso PS, Barker TM, Earwaker WJ, Bruce LJ, Atkinson RL,
Lanigan MW, Arvier JF, Effeney DJ. Stereolithographic biomodelling in cranio-maxillofacial surgery: a prospective trial. Journal of CranioMaxillofacial Surgery. 1999; 27: 30-37.
[7] Brogden BG. Forensic radiology. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1995.
[8] Jamie J. W. Beck, What is the future of imaging in forensic practice, Radiography 2011; 212-217.
[9] A. G. Filler. The history, development and ımpact of computed ımaging in neurological diagnosis and neurosurgery: CT, MRI, and DTI Nature Precedings, 2009
[10] Peddie J, The history of visual magic in computers, 2013: p.6
[11] Rocha SD, Dalton DLP, Cavalcanti MGP. Applicability of 3D-CT facial reconstruction for forensic individual identification, Pesqui Odontol Bras. 2003; 17(1): 24-28.
[12] Prince JL, Links JM, “Medical imaging signals and systems”, Pearson Prentice Hall Bioengineering. New Jersey, USA:(2006):3-13.
[13] Keller SS, Roberts N. Measurement of brain volume using MRI: software, techniques, choices and prerequisites. J Anthropol Sci. 2009; 127-151.
[14] Watanabe E, Watanabe T, Manaka S: Three-dimensional digitizer (Neuronavigator): new equipment for CT-guided stereotactic surgery. Surg Neurol 27:543-547, 1987
[15] Muacevic A, Uhi E, Steiger HJ, Reulen HJ: Accuracy and clinical applicability of a passaive marker based frameless neuronavigation system. J Clin Neurosci 7(5): 414-418, 2000
[16] Wirtz, C. Rainer, et al. "The benefit of neuronavigation for neurosurgery analyzed by its impact on glioblastoma surgery." Neurological research 22.4 (2000): 354-360.
[17] Gumprecht, Hartmut K., Darius C. Widenka, and Christianto B. Lumenta. "BrainLab VectorVision Neuronavigation System: technology and clinical experiences in 131 cases." Neurosurgery 44.1 (1999): 97-104.