Analytic Hierarchy Process and Topsis Methods of Construction Site Selection
Seher Arslankaya1*, Ömer Baştürk2
1Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey
2Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey
* Corresponding author: aseher@sakarya.edu.tr
Presented at the 4th International Symposium on Innovative Approaches in Engineering and Natural Sciences (ISAS WINTER-2019 (ENS)), Samsun, Turkey, Nov 22, 2019
SETSCI Conference Proceedings, 2019, 9, Page (s): 231-238 , https://doi.org/10.36287/setsci.4.6.067
Published Date: 22 December 2019 | 880 10
Abstract
Decision making is a mental process in which one of the different options is chosen. All decision-making processes end with a decision. In this thesis, site selection for a new project was examined. Investments requiring very high budgets, such as the construction sector, need to be made more meticulously. AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) and TOPSIS methods were used in decision making process. Expert Choice program was used for AHP analysis. The main criteria were determined during the selection process. These criteria were determined by the construction industry experts and individuals (potential customers) by taking into consideration the marital status of the people, their children, their financial situation and their way of living. Criteria have different degrees of importance for people. Therefore, each criterion was compared with the other criteria by weight method. In comparison, we worked very meticulously. Each comparison matrix was examined individually. During the implementation, attention was paid to the innovations around the candidate construction sites. In practice, site selection was made according to site selection, transportation, cost, title deeds, cadastre and municipal operations, and preference suggestions were given.
Keywords - Decision making, Analytical Hierarchy Process, AHP, TOPSIS, expert choice, construction
References
[1] Gülsün, B., Tuzkaya, G., Şen, A., Düzenli depolama alanı yeri seçiminde çok amaçlı karar verme: Bir Electre uygulaması, 2. Ulusal Sistem Mühendisliği Kongresi 21. Yüzyılda Sistem ve İnovasyon, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, 178, İstanbul, Türkiye, Şubat, 2008.
[2] A.A. Supciller and O. Çapraz, Based on AHP – TOPSIS Method Supplier Selection http://www.acarindex.com/dosyalar/makale/acarindex-1423905272.pdf, (date of access:01.02.2019)
[3] N. Ömürbek, Y. Makas and V. Ömürbek, Corporate Project With Ahp And Topsis Methods Selection Of Management Software, https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/215048, (date of access: 01.02.2019)
[4] A.A. Zaidan, B.B.Zaidan, A. Haiqi, M.L.M. Kiah, M. Hussain, M. Abdulnabi, Evaluation and selection of open-source EMR software packages based on integrated AHP and TOPSIS, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046414002627, (date of access: 01.02.2019)
[6] L. Socaciu, O. Giurgiu, D. Banyai and M. Simion, PCM selection using AHP method to maintain thermal comfort of the vehicle occupants, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876610215028970, (date of access:01.02.2019)
[7] Rasyonel,
2018,https://www.sayistay.gov.tr/tr/Upload/95906369/files/dergi/pdf/der102m2.pdf, (date of access: 17.04.2018)
[8] Cil, İ., Decision Theory and Analysis Lecture Notes, Sakarya University, 2017.
[9] Kriterler, 2018, http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/309976, (date of access: 30.03.2018)
[10] Analitik, 2018, http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/210933, (date of access: 17.11.2019)
[11] Yöntem, 2018,http://content.lms.sabis.sakarya.edu.tr/Uploads/49858/33743/9.hafta_ahp.pdf, (30.011.2019)
[12] Karşılaştırma, 2018, http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/203388, (date of access: 05.08.2018)
[13] Topsis, 2018 http://www.muhlisozdemir.com/blog/topsis/, (date of access: 26.04.2018)