{ "article_id": 803, "public_id": "0a8de704-aec0-4495-b166-3d4c1123be29", "internal_identifier": null, "source_identifier": "39:168", "status": "published", "type": "research_article", "title": "Güreş Sporuna Yönelik Guttman Tutum Ölçeği Geliştirilmesi", "title_secondary": null, "abstract": "Bu çalışmanın amacı, geleneksel Türk sporlarından biri olan güreş sporuna yönelik bireylerin tutumlarını ölçmek\r\namacıyla Guttman tipinde bir tutum ölçeği geliştirilmesidir. Guttman ölçeğinde, Thurstone ve Likert ölçekleri gibi diğer tutum\r\nölçeklerinde temel sorun haline gelen tek boyutluluk ve üretilebilirlik kavramları üzerinde ayrıntılı olarak durulmuştur.\r\nDolayısıyla Guttman ölçeğinin diğer tutum ölçeklerinden en belirgin farklılığı, ortaya koyduğu skalogram modeli (birikimli\r\nmodel) sayesinde belli sorulara verilen cevaplardan yola çıkarak diğer sorulara verilen cevapları tahmin edebilme olanağı\r\nsağlamasıdır. Guttman ölçeğinin taslak formunun 10-12 maddeden, nihai formunun ise 4-6 maddeden oluşması önerilmektedir.\r\nÇalışma kapsamında 10 maddeden oluşan taslak halindeki Güreşe Yönelik Guttman Tutum Ölçeği, 60 kişilik bir örnekleme\r\nuygulanmıştır. Bireylerin ifadelere verdikleri cevaplar “Katılıyorum=1” ve “Katılmıyorum=0” biçiminde iki kategorili olarak\r\npuanlanmıştır. Yapılan madde analizi sonucunda 5 maddenin ayırt edicilik oranının 0,80’in altında olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bu\r\nmaddelerin ölçekten çıkarılmasıyla ölçeğin nihai formu, geçerliğinin bir göstergesi olan ayırt edicilik özelliği yüksek olan 5\r\nmaddeden oluşmuştur. Nihai formda yer alan beş maddeden üçü olumlu, ikisi ise olumsuz tutumları yansıtan ifadelerden\r\noluşmaktadır. Ölçeğin güvenirlik göstergeleri olan üretilebilirlik katsayısı 0,937 olarak, ölçeklenebilirlik katsayısı ise 0,64\r\nolarak hesaplanmıştır. Bu sonuçlara göre nihai formu 5 maddeden oluşan Güreşe Yönelik Guttman Tutum Ölçeği’nin tek\r\nboyutluluğu sağlayan ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır . ", "language": "tr", "english_title": "Development of a Guttman Attitude Scale Towards Wrestling", "english_abstract": "The aim of this study is to develop a Guttman-type attitude scale to measure individuals' attitudes towards wrestling, one of the traditional Turkish sports. The Guttman scale focuses in detail on the concepts of one-dimensionality and manufacturability, which are fundamental problems in other attitude scales such as the Thurstone and Likert scales. Therefore, the most significant difference of the Guttman scale from other attitude scales is that, thanks to its scalogram model (cumulative model), it allows for the prediction of answers to other questions based on answers to certain questions. It is suggested that the draft form of the Guttman scale consist of 10-12 items, and the final form consist of 4-6 items. Within the scope of the study, the draft Guttman Attitude Scale Towards Wrestling, consisting of 10 items, was applied to a sample of 60 people. Individuals' responses to the statements were scored in two categories: \"Agree=1\" and \"Disagree=0\".\r\nItem analysis revealed that 5 items had a discrimination ratio below 0.80.\r\nBy removing these items from the scale, the final form of the scale consisted of 5 items with high discrimination, an indicator of its validity. Of the five items in the final form, three reflect positive attitudes and two reflect negative attitudes.\r\nThe reliability indicators of the scale, the producibility coefficient, were calculated as 0.937, and the scalability coefficient as 0.64.\r\nBased on these results, it was concluded that the Guttman Attitudes Towards Wrestling Scale, with its final form consisting of 5 items, is a reliable measurement tool that ensures one-dimensionality.", "doi": null, "doi_url": null, "resource_url": "https://www.set-science.com/a/0a8de704-aec0-4495-b166-3d4c1123be29", "pdf_url": "https://www.set-science.com/a/0a8de704-aec0-4495-b166-3d4c1123be29/pdf", "og_image": "https://www.set-science.com/assets/img/og-card-v2.png", "authors": [ { "public_id": "424b89e4-ae8f-4a80-866a-ec0ec2e0637e", "given": "Sait", "family": "Bardakçı", "full": "Sait Bardakçı", "literal": null, "orcid": null, "orcid_url": null, "email": "cazcagdas@gmail.com", "corresponding": false, "sequence": "first", "affiliations": [ { "name": "Sivas Cumhuriyet University", "department": null, "country": null, "country_code": null, "ror": null, "ror_url": null } ] }, { "public_id": "b752eff4-c565-4776-8c47-947418f9c610", "given": "Çağdaş", "family": "Caz", "full": "Çağdaş Caz", "literal": null, "orcid": null, "orcid_url": null, "email": "cazcagdas@gmail.com", "corresponding": true, "sequence": "additional", "affiliations": [ { "name": "Yozgat Bozok University", "department": null, "country": null, "country_code": null, "ror": null, "ror_url": null } ] } ], "keywords": [], "translations": [ { "language": "en", "title": "Development of a Guttman Attitude Scale Towards Wrestling", "abstract": "The aim of this study is to develop a Guttman-type attitude scale to measure individuals' attitudes towards wrestling, one of the traditional Turkish sports. The Guttman scale focuses in detail on the concepts of one-dimensionality and manufacturability, which are fundamental problems in other attitude scales such as the Thurstone and Likert scales. Therefore, the most significant difference of the Guttman scale from other attitude scales is that, thanks to its scalogram model (cumulative model), it allows for the prediction of answers to other questions based on answers to certain questions. It is suggested that the draft form of the Guttman scale consist of 10-12 items, and the final form consist of 4-6 items. Within the scope of the study, the draft Guttman Attitude Scale Towards Wrestling, consisting of 10 items, was applied to a sample of 60 people. Individuals' responses to the statements were scored in two categories: \"Agree=1\" and \"Disagree=0\".\r\nItem analysis revealed that 5 items had a discrimination ratio below 0.80.\r\nBy removing these items from the scale, the final form of the scale consisted of 5 items with high discrimination, an indicator of its validity. Of the five items in the final form, three reflect positive attitudes and two reflect negative attitudes.\r\nThe reliability indicators of the scale, the producibility coefficient, were calculated as 0.937, and the scalability coefficient as 0.64.\r\nBased on these results, it was concluded that the Guttman Attitudes Towards Wrestling Scale, with its final form consisting of 5 items, is a reliable measurement tool that ensures one-dimensionality.", "keywords": [ "Güreş, Tutum, Guttman Ölçeği, Güvenirlik, Geçerlik" ] } ], "subjects": [], "subject_names": [], "published_date": "2018-12-31", "published_year": "2018", "received_date": null, "accepted_date": null, "volume": "3", "issue": null, "page_first": "889", "page_last": "892", "article_number": null, "conference": { "short_name": "ISAS2018-Winter", "full_title": "2nd International Symposium on Innovative Approaches in Scientific Studies", "name": "2nd International Symposium on Innovative Approaches in Scientific Studies", "acronym": "ISAS2018-Winter", "location": "Samsun, Türkiye", "start_date": "2018-11-30", "end_date": null, "public_id": "b8a703cc-09f7-4d5b-ae60-eb31a1050720" }, "proceedings": { "title": "2nd International Symposium on Innovative Approaches in Scientific Studies", "series_title": "Setsci conference indexing system", "publisher": "SET Technology", "isbn": null, "eisbn": null, "issn": "2618-6446", "eissn": null, "doi": null, "doi_prefix": null, "slug": "setsci-volume-3-2018-legacy-39", "public_id": "641f522e-9cf0-4c89-be17-c6037f3d1bca", "url": "https://www.set-science.com/p/setsci-volume-3-2018-legacy-39" }, "license": { "name": "CC BY 4.0", "url": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/", "code": "CC-BY-4.0", "open_access": true }, "copyright": { "holder": "SET Technology", "year": "2018" }, "funding_statement": null, "funders": [], "references": [ { "order": 1, "raw": "M. Akkurt, “Kahramanmaraş’ta yapılan geleneksel güreşlerin tarihsel gelişimi ve toplum tarafından algılanış biçimleri”, Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi, Kahramanmaraş, 2008.", "doi": null, "title": null, "authors": null, "source": null, "year": null, "volume": null, "pages": null }, { "order": 2, "raw": "C. Atabeyoğlu, Geleneksel Türk Güreşi ve Kırkpınar, İstanbul: TMOK Yayınları: 5, 2000.", "doi": null, "title": null, "authors": null, "source": null, "year": null, "volume": null, "pages": null }, { "order": 3, "raw": "G. Bayraktar ve E. Tozoğlu, “Güreş sporuna küreselleşme sürecinin etkileri”. Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Citl 1, Sayı 2, s. 71-92, 2015.", "doi": null, "title": null, "authors": null, "source": null, "year": null, "volume": null, "pages": null }, { "order": 4, "raw": "O. Güven, Türklerde Spor Kültürü, Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basım Evi, 1992.", "doi": null, "title": null, "authors": null, "source": null, "year": null, "volume": null, "pages": null }, { "order": 5, "raw": "E. Y. Yiğit, Yenilmeyi Düşünmediler, Ankara: Öztepe Matbaacılık, 2012.", "doi": null, "title": null, "authors": null, "source": null, "year": null, "volume": null, "pages": null }, { "order": 6, "raw": "M. Fişne, S. Bardakçı ve Y. Karagöz, “Ata sporumuz güreşe yönelik günümüzdeki toplumsal bakışın değerlendirilmesi”, CBÜ Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt 12, Sayı 1, s. 28-42, 2017.", "doi": null, "title": null, "authors": null, "source": null, "year": null, "volume": null, "pages": null }, { "order": 7, "raw": "S. Şahin, (2011b). “Sosyal değişme sürecinde Türkiye’de toplumun güreş sporuna olan ilgi, bilgi ve değer yargılarının belirlenmesi”, EJournal of New World Sciences Academy, Cilt 6, Sayı 3, s. 193-205, 2011.", "doi": null, "title": null, "authors": null, "source": null, "year": null, "volume": null, "pages": null }, { "order": 8, "raw": "İ. E. Özgüven, Psikolojik Testler, Ankara: PDREM Yayınları, 1994.", "doi": null, "title": null, "authors": null, "source": null, "year": null, "volume": null, "pages": null }, { "order": 9, "raw": "E. Tavşancıl, Tutumların Ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile Veri Analizi, Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, 2002.", "doi": null, "title": null, "authors": null, "source": null, "year": null, "volume": null, "pages": null }, { "order": 10, "raw": "H. Şencan, Sosyal ve Davranışsal Ölçümlerde Güvenilirlik ve Geçerlilik, Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık, 2005.", "doi": null, "title": null, "authors": null, "source": null, "year": null, "volume": null, "pages": null }, { "order": 11, "raw": "L. Guttman, “A Basis for Scaling Qualitative Data”, Readings in Attitude Theory and Measurement, Ed. Martin Fishbein, New York:John Wiley and Sons, 1967.", "doi": null, "title": null, "authors": null, "source": null, "year": null, "volume": null, "pages": null }, { "order": 12, "raw": "L. W. Anderson, “Guttman Scales”, Educational Research, Methodology and Measurement. An International Handbook, Ed. J. P. Keeves, New York: Pergoman Press, 1988.", "doi": null, "title": null, "authors": null, "source": null, "year": null, "volume": null, "pages": null } ], "statements": { "acknowledgements": null, "conflict_of_interest": null, "data_availability": null, "ai_disclosure": null }, "credit": [], "history": { "published": "2018-12-31" } }