setsci Setsci conference indexing system 2618-6446 SET Technology 168b3cfc-4820-49e4-9e63-c1bd66d2d50e Investigation of 3D Printing Filling Structures Effect on Mechanical Properties and Surface Roughness of PET-G Materials Products Kam Menderes İpekçi Ahmet Saruhan Hamit Düzce University 08 12 2017 1 126 129 © 2017 SET Technology 2017 SET Technology CC BY 4.0

3D printing filling structures at prototyping and design stage are increasingly important issue for products with complicated shapes. The objective of the present study is to investigate 3D printing filling structures effect on mechanical properties and surface roughness of PET-G (Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol) material products. PET-G material was preferred because of its durability, high transparency and odor characteristics. A variety of methods are used to manufacture products. Each has its advantages and drawbacks. One of the these methods to adopt for this investigation was FDM (Fused Deposition Modeling) 3D printing method. The FDM method was considered that it has a direct effect on the mechanical properties and surface roughness of the product. The experiments were carried out using PET-G materials with different printing filling structures (rectilinear, triangular, full honeycomb), at processing speed of 50 mm/s and all other operating parameters fixed same conditions on 3D printer. Uniaxial tensile tests, hardness measurements and surface roughness measurements of the printed products were carried out. The results were analyzed and compared.  

 3D printer, PET-G, FDM, filling structures 3D printer, PET-G, FDM, filling structures J.P. Kruth, M.C. Leu, T. Nakagawa, “Progress in Additive Manufacturing and Rapid Prototyping”, Keynote Papers, 47(2), 525-540 (1998). Azari, S.Nikzad ,“The evolution of rapid prototyping in dentistry: a review”, Rapid Prototyping Journal, 216 – 225 (2009). K. Herrmanna, C. Gärtnera, D. Güllmara, M. Krämera, J. R. Reichenbacha,“3D printing of MRI Compatible Components: Why every MRI Research Group Should Have a Low-budget 3D printer”, Medical Engineering & Physics, 1373-1380 (2014). Üç Boyutlu Yazıcılar, “Kendini Kopyalayan Üç Boyutlu Yazıcı”, www.3byazici.com (2014). “3D Printersand Components”, https://iwanta3dprinter.wordpress .com/3d- print (2014) Üç Boyutlu Yazıcılar, “3D Printers”, www.ultimaker.com (2014). D.A. Roberson, D. Espalin, R.B. Wicker ,“3D Printer Selection: A Decision-making Evaluation and Ranking Model”, Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 201-212 (2013). M. Chhabra, Rupinder Singh ,“Rapid casting solutions: a review”, Rapid Prototyping Journal, 328 -350 (2011). Üç Boyutlu Metal Yazıcılar, “Metal 3D Printers”, www.donanimhaber.com (2014). T. Billiet, M. Vandenhaute, J. Schelfhout, S. V. Vlierberghe, P. Dubruel, “A review of trends and limitations in hydrogel-rapid prototyping for tissue Engineering”, Biomaterials 33, 6020-6041(2012). D. Çelik, Tersine Mühendislikle Üç Boyutlu Yazıcı Tasarımı Ve Üretimi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Karabük Üni., Fen Bil. Enstitüsü, Mayıs 2015. Sood, A.K., Ohdar, R.K., Mahapatra, S.S., 2010. “Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fused deposition modelling processed part”, Materials & Desing, cilt 31, sayı 1, s 287-295. Wang, W., Wang, T. Y., Yang, Z., Liu, L., Tong, X., Tong, W., Deng, J., Chen, F., and Liu, X. 2013. Cost-effective printing of 3D objects with skin-frame structures. ACM Trans. Graph. 32, 5. Wilson, S. 1990. A new face of aerospace honeycomb. Materials & Design 11, 6, 323 – 326. Ahrabi A.Z., Pet Atıkları Kullanılarak Kompozit Malzeme Üretiminin Araştırılması, Ankara Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Kimya Mühendisliği anabilim Dalı, Ankara, sf 33-51, 2009. http://hbogm.meb.gov.tr/modulerprogramlar/kursprogramlari/metal/moduller/tahribatli_muayene.pdf http://www.rigid3d.com/rigid3d-zero2-3d-yazici/ Ahrabi A.Z., Pet Atıkları Kullanılarak Kompozit Malzeme Üretiminin Araştırılması, Ankara Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Kimya Mühendisliği anabilim Dalı, Ankara, 33-51, 2009.