{ "article_id": 1407, "public_id": "38d0bd0e-3735-487a-b3cd-fa7fb21e8d83", "internal_identifier": null, "source_identifier": "87:67", "status": "published", "type": "research_article", "title": "Açık Uçlu Soruların Çok Yüzeyli Rasch Modeli ile Analizi", "title_secondary": null, "abstract": "Sınavlarda ölçme aracı olarak kullanılan açık uçlu sorulardan oluşan sınavlarda yansız puanlama önemlidir. Açık uçlu sorular, öğrencilere kendilerini özgür bir biçimde ifade etme olanağı sunmakta ve çeşitli becerilerin farkındalığına imkân sunmaktadır. Ayrıca kişilerin bazı konularda olan yetersizliklerini görmeyi sağlamaktadır.  Ancak açık uçlu soruların birçok olumsuz noktaları da bulunmaktadır. Özelikle puanlayıcıların yanlılığı açık uçlu sınavların değerlendirilmesinde hataların ortaya çıkmasına sebebiyet vermektedir. Bu hataları ortadan kaldırmak yada açık uçlu sınav değerlendirmelerin de hatayı en aza indirgemek için farklı analiz yöntemlerine ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır. Bu sebeple çalışmamızda klasik test teorisine alternatif olarak sunulmuş Madde yanıt teorisi ile açık uçlu soruların analizi amaçlanmıştır. ", "language": "tr", "english_title": "Analysis of Open-Ended Questions with Many Facet Rasch Model", "english_abstract": "Neutral scoring is important for open-ended questions used as a measurement tool in exams.Open-ended questions provide students to express themselves freely and give them opportunit to be aware of their various skills.Also it provides peole to see their inadequacies in some subjects.But open-ended questions include a lot of negative points as well.Especially partiality of raters leads to errors in the evaluation of open-ended exams.Different methods of analysis are needed to eliminate these errors or to minimize the errors in open-ended exam evaluations.For this reason,in our study,it has been aimed to analyze open-ended questions with \"Item Response Theory\" presented as an alternative to \"Classical Test Theory\"", "doi": "10.36287/setsci.4.9.067", "doi_url": "https://doi.org/10.36287/setsci.4.9.067", "resource_url": "https://www.set-science.com/a/38d0bd0e-3735-487a-b3cd-fa7fb21e8d83", "pdf_url": "https://www.set-science.com/a/38d0bd0e-3735-487a-b3cd-fa7fb21e8d83/pdf", "og_image": "https://www.set-science.com/assets/img/og-card-v2.png", "authors": [ { "public_id": "ddcce5e7-d5b5-43d6-a860-984c34089a1a", "given": "Şirin", "family": "Çetin", "full": "Şirin Çetin", "literal": null, "orcid": null, "orcid_url": null, "email": "cetinsirin55@gmail.com", "corresponding": true, "sequence": "first", "affiliations": [ { "name": "Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University", "department": null, "country": null, "country_code": null, "ror": null, "ror_url": null } ] } ], "keywords": [], "translations": [ { "language": "en", "title": "Analysis of Open-Ended Questions with Many Facet Rasch Model", "abstract": "Neutral scoring is important for open-ended questions used as a measurement tool in exams.Open-ended questions provide students to express themselves freely and give them opportunit to be aware of their various skills.Also it provides peole to see their inadequacies in some subjects.But open-ended questions include a lot of negative points as well.Especially partiality of raters leads to errors in the evaluation of open-ended exams.Different methods of analysis are needed to eliminate these errors or to minimize the errors in open-ended exam evaluations.For this reason,in our study,it has been aimed to analyze open-ended questions with \"Item Response Theory\" presented as an alternative to \"Classical Test Theory\"", "keywords": [ "Madde Yanıt analizi, Açık Uçlu Soru, Çok Yüzeyli Rasch Modeli" ] } ], "subjects": [], "subject_names": [], "published_date": "2019-12-23", "published_year": "2019", "received_date": null, "accepted_date": null, "volume": "12", "issue": null, "page_first": "108", "page_last": "110", "article_number": null, "conference": { "short_name": "ISAS WINTER-2019 (HSS)", "full_title": "4th International Symposium on Innovative Approaches in Health and Sports Sciences", "name": "4th International Symposium on Innovative Approaches in Health and Sports Sciences", "acronym": "ISAS WINTER-2019 (HSS)", "location": "Samsun, Türkiye", "start_date": "2019-11-22", "end_date": null, "public_id": "76ee0eb0-7f71-420c-9d1c-2b81a3a76e96" }, "proceedings": { "title": "4th International Symposium on Innovative Approaches in Health and Sports Sciences", "series_title": "SETSCI Conference Proceedings", "publisher": "SET Technology", "isbn": "978-605-81988-9-0", "eisbn": null, "issn": null, "eissn": "2687-5527", "doi": null, "doi_prefix": "10.36287", "slug": "setsci-volume-12-2019-legacy-87", "public_id": "083b6600-6489-43ad-9a7d-d9fd7505e910", "url": "https://www.set-science.com/p/setsci-volume-12-2019-legacy-87" }, "license": { "name": "CC BY 4.0", "url": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/", "code": "CC-BY-4.0", "open_access": true }, "copyright": { "holder": "SET Technology", "year": "2019" }, "funding_statement": null, "funders": [], "references": [ { "order": 1, "raw": "1)\tBirenbaum, M., & Feldman, R.A. (1998) Relationships between learning patterns and attitudes towards two assessment formats. Educational Research, 40(1), 90-98.\r\n2)\tSimkin, M.G., & Kuechler, W.L. (2005). Multiple-choice tests and student understanding: What is the connection. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 3(1), 73-97.\r\n3)\tHaladyna, T. M. (1997). Writing Test Item to Evaluate Higher Order Thinking. USA: Allyn & Bacon.\r\n4)\tTuckman, B.W. (1991). Evaluating the alternative to multiple-choice testing for teachers. Contemporary education, 62(4), 299-300.\r\n5)\tRomagnano, L. (2001). The myth of objectivity in mathematics assessment. Mathematics Teacher, 94(1), 31-37.\r\n6)\tTakunyacı, M. (2016). Çoktan seçmeli sorulara dayalı olmayan bir kitle matematik sınavı sürecinin değerlendirilmesi: Grup uyumu değerlendirme modeli, Doktora Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi.\r\n7)\tStecher, B. (2010). Performance assessment in an era of standards-based educational accountability. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.\r\n8)\tCardinet, J., Johnson, S., & Pini, G. (2010). Applying generalizability theory using EduG. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.\r\n9)\tZhu, X. (2009). Assessing fit of item response models for performance assessments using bayesian analysis. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, ABD.\r\n10)\tŞahin, M. G., Taşdelen Teker, G. ve Güler, N. (2016). An analysis of peer assessment through many facet rasch model, Journal of Education and Practice, Vol 7, No 32.\r\n11)\tHambleton RK, Swaminathan H, Rogers HJ. Fundamentals of item response theory. Sage Publications; 1991).\r\n12)\tLinacre, J.M. (1989, Many-facet Rasch measurement. Chicago: MESA Press.;\r\n13)\tLunz, M.E., &Wright, B.D. (1997), Latent trait models for performance examinations. In J. Rost & R. Langeheine (Eds.), Applications of latent trait and latent class models in the social sciences (pp. 80-88). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.).\r\n14)\t (Linacre, J. M. (1989). 1989: Many-facet Rasch measurement. Chicago, IL: MESA Press. ", "doi": null, "title": null, "authors": null, "source": null, "year": null, "volume": null, "pages": null } ], "statements": { "acknowledgements": null, "conflict_of_interest": null, "data_availability": null, "ai_disclosure": null }, "credit": [], "history": { "published": "2019-12-23" } }