{ "article_id": 1013, "public_id": "c111ea58-36e6-423f-9f31-5cf06c2b526d", "internal_identifier": null, "source_identifier": "42:18", "status": "published", "type": "research_article", "title": "PROMETHEE Yöntemi ile Bir Teknik Müşavir Firma Seçimi", "title_secondary": null, "abstract": "Teknik müşavir, doğal veya inşa edilmiş çevre üzerinde teknolojiye dayalı bilgi ve düşünceye dayalı hizmet veren kişi veya kuruluştur. Uluslar arası inşaat projelerinde ilgili yapım projesinin projelendirme ve ihale aşamalarından yapım kontrolü, ödemeler ve kesin kabul aşamalarına kadar önemli görevler yürütür. Pek çok önemli yapım projesinde işveren tarafından görev verilmesi gerekliliği bulunmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, bir işverenin teknik müşavir firma seçim seçimi PROMETHEE yöntemi ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu yöntemde, uzman görüşleri yardımı ile kriterler belirlenmiş ve alternatifler tespit edilmiştir. Alternatif adayların öncelikleri PROMETHEE yöntemi ile hesaplanarak öncelik sıraları belirlenmiştir. PROMETHEE yöntemiyle elde edilen sonuçlar PROMETHEE I ve PROMETHEE II yöntemleri ile irdelenmiştir. Ayrıca GAİA Düzlemi yardımı ile analiz edilmiştir. Bu yöntem ile gerekli kriterleri sağlayan alternatif adaylar arasından en uygun teknik müşavir firmanın belirlenmesi sağlanmış ve işletmelerde doğru teknik müşavir firmanın seçilememesinden kaynaklanan maliyetler ve seçim sürecindeki subjektif değerlendirmeler en aza indirilmeye çalışılmıştır. Yöntem tüm kriterler eşit önem derecesinde iken ve kriterlere farklı ağırlıklar verilmiş olarak iki farklı şekilde uygulanmıştır. Bu iki uygulamadan çıkan sonuçlar karşılaştırılmıştır.", "language": "tr", "english_title": "Choosing a Technical Consultant Company with PROMETHEE Method", "english_abstract": "The technical consultant is the person or organization that provides technology based knowledge based on technology on natural or built environment. It carries out important tasks in the international construction projects from the project preparation and tender stages of construction project to construction control, payments and final acceptance stages. Many important construction projects, they have to be assigned by the employer. In this study, the selection of technical consultant company of an employer was carried out by PROMETHEE method. In this method, criteria were determined with the help of expert opinions and alternatives were determined. The priorities of the alternative candidates were determined by the PROMETHEE method and their priorities were determined. PROMETHEE II and PROMETHEE II methods were used to evaluate the results. It was also analyzed with the help of GAIA Plane. With this method, the most appropriate technical advisory firm has been determined among the alternative candidates providing the necessary criteria and the costs arising from not selecting the right technical advisor firm in the enterprises and the subjective evaluations in the selection process have been tried to be minimized. The method has been applied in two different ways, while all criteria are of equal importance and different weights are given to the criteria. The results of these two applications were compared.", "doi": null, "doi_url": null, "resource_url": "https://www.set-science.com/a/c111ea58-36e6-423f-9f31-5cf06c2b526d", "pdf_url": "https://www.set-science.com/a/c111ea58-36e6-423f-9f31-5cf06c2b526d/pdf", "og_image": "https://www.set-science.com/assets/img/og-card-v2.png", "authors": [ { "public_id": "c035508e-7c31-4de6-a6a8-02b09ecf68d9", "given": "Latif Onur ", "family": "Uğur", "full": "Latif Onur  Uğur", "literal": null, "orcid": null, "orcid_url": null, "email": "latifugur@duzce.edu.tr", "corresponding": true, "sequence": "first", "affiliations": [ { "name": "Düzce University", "department": null, "country": null, "country_code": null, "ror": null, "ror_url": null } ] }, { "public_id": "d6bf3be1-8e25-4b9e-a439-9ffe6fe7e610", "given": "Merve ", "family": "Ölçer  ", "full": "Merve  Ölçer  ", "literal": null, "orcid": null, "orcid_url": null, "email": "latifugur@duzce.edu.tr", "corresponding": false, "sequence": "additional", "affiliations": [ { "name": "Düzce University", "department": null, "country": null, "country_code": null, "ror": null, "ror_url": null } ] } ], "keywords": [], "translations": [ { "language": "en", "title": "Choosing a Technical Consultant Company with PROMETHEE Method", "abstract": "The technical consultant is the person or organization that provides technology based knowledge based on technology on natural or built environment. It carries out important tasks in the international construction projects from the project preparation and tender stages of construction project to construction control, payments and final acceptance stages. Many important construction projects, they have to be assigned by the employer. In this study, the selection of technical consultant company of an employer was carried out by PROMETHEE method. In this method, criteria were determined with the help of expert opinions and alternatives were determined. The priorities of the alternative candidates were determined by the PROMETHEE method and their priorities were determined. PROMETHEE II and PROMETHEE II methods were used to evaluate the results. It was also analyzed with the help of GAIA Plane. With this method, the most appropriate technical advisory firm has been determined among the alternative candidates providing the necessary criteria and the costs arising from not selecting the right technical advisor firm in the enterprises and the subjective evaluations in the selection process have been tried to be minimized. The method has been applied in two different ways, while all criteria are of equal importance and different weights are given to the criteria. The results of these two applications were compared.", "keywords": [ "PROMETHEE Yöntemi, Çok Kriterli Karar Verme (ÇKKV), Teknik müşavir mühendis firma" ] } ], "subjects": [], "subject_names": [], "published_date": "2019-06-01", "published_year": "2019", "received_date": null, "accepted_date": null, "volume": "4", "issue": null, "page_first": "89", "page_last": "101", "article_number": null, "conference": { "short_name": "ISAS2019-ENS", "full_title": "3rd International Symposium on Innovative Approaches in Scientific Studies (Engineering and Natural Sciences)", "name": "3rd International Symposium on Innovative Approaches in Scientific Studies (Engineering and Natural Sciences)", "acronym": "ISAS2019-ENS", "location": "Ankara, Türkiye", "start_date": "2019-04-19", "end_date": null, "public_id": "ed3b36e9-38cf-4aeb-a135-833c969cc89f" }, "proceedings": { "title": "3rd International Symposium on Innovative Approaches in Scientific Studies (Engineering and Natural Sciences)", "series_title": "Setsci conference indexing system", "publisher": "SET Technology", "isbn": null, "eisbn": null, "issn": "2618-6446", "eissn": null, "doi": null, "doi_prefix": null, "slug": "setsci-volume-4-2019-legacy-42", "public_id": "24d215ef-a545-4351-9725-6e9bdb167b3c", "url": "https://www.set-science.com/p/setsci-volume-4-2019-legacy-42" }, "license": { "name": "CC BY 4.0", "url": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/", "code": "CC-BY-4.0", "open_access": true }, "copyright": { "holder": "SET Technology", "year": "2019" }, "funding_statement": null, "funders": [], "references": [ { "order": 1, "raw": "1. http://tmmmb.org.tr/images/tmmmb/gem/GEM_Seminer_Teknik_musavir_nedir.pdf\r\n\r\n2. http://www.imo.org.tr/resimler/ekutuphane/pdf/280.pdf\r\n\r\n3. https://www.csb.gov.tr/db/strateji/editordosya/Mehmet_Ali_Simsek-Uzmanlik_Tezi.pdf\r\n\r\n4. http://tmmmb.org.tr/images/tmmmb/gem/GEM_Seminer_Teknik_musavir_nedir.pdf\r\n\r\n5. TürkMMMB 2012, 5\r\n\r\n6. https://www.igeme.com.tr/teknik-musavirlik-nedir/\r\n\r\n7. https://www.turkcebilgi.com/t%C3%BCnel#bilgi\r\n\r\n8. http://www.emay.com/fu_tuneller.aspx\r\n\r\n9. Keyser, W.D. ve Peeters,P. (1996), “ A Note On TheUse Of PROMETHEE Multicriteria Methods”, European Journal of Operational Research, 89, 457-461.\r\n\r\n10. Yılmaz,B. Ve Dağreviren,M. (2010), “Ekipman Seçimi Probleminde Promethee ve Bulanık Promethee Yöntemlerinin Karşılaştırmalı Analizi”, Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(4), 811-826.\r\n\r\n11. Soba,M. (2012), “Promethee Yöntemi Kullanarak En Uygun Panelvan Otomobil Seçimi ve Bir Uygulama”, Journal of Yasar University, 28(7), 4708-4721.\r\n\r\n12. Tuzkaya,G. , Özgen, D. Ve Gülsün, B. (2011), “Malzeme Taşıma Sistemi Alternatiflerinin Değerlendirilmesinde Bulanık-Promethee Yaklaşımı”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 12(1), 144-155.\r\n\r\n13. Amponsah, S.K. , Darwah, K.F. ve Inusah, A. (2012), “Logistic Preference Function for Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE) Decision Analysis”, African Journal of Mathmetics and Computer Science Research, 5(6), 112-119.\r\n\r\n14. https://www.csb.gov.tr/db/strateji/editordosya/Mehmet_Ali_Simsek-Uzmanlik_Tezi.pdf\r\n\r\n15. Huseyin Şenkayas1, Haluk Hekimoğlu, (2013), “Çok Kriterli Tedarikçi Seçimi Problemine PROMETHEE Yöntemi Uygulaması”, Verimlilik Dergisi, 66-67.\r\n\r\n16. Yrd. Doç. Dr. Aşkın Özdağoğlu, Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, Cilt 9, Sayı 19, 2013.\r\n\r\n17. Genç, Masca, s.548-549.\r\n\r\n18. (Mareschal ve Brans, 1988:76)\r\n\r\n19. Sünsüs dağ bahadır fatih yıldırım s.60", "doi": null, "title": null, "authors": null, "source": null, "year": null, "volume": null, "pages": null } ], "statements": { "acknowledgements": null, "conflict_of_interest": null, "data_availability": null, "ai_disclosure": null }, "credit": [], "history": { "published": "2019-06-01" } }