<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="en">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">setsci</journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Setsci conference indexing system</journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn>2618-6446</issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>SET Technology</publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">e071d89f-2a31-48a1-98ce-e0e64ebe2fde</article-id>
   <title-group>
    <article-title>DETERMINING USER BEHAVIORS WITH USABILITY TESTING TOOLS AND PLANNING USER INTERFACES</article-title>
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
     <name>
      <surname>Yüksek</surname>
      <given-names>Ahmet Gürkan</given-names>
     </name>
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author">
     <name>
      <surname>Arslan</surname>
      <given-names>Halil</given-names>
     </name>
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author">
     <name>
      <surname>Lemi</surname>
      <given-names>Mustafa</given-names>
     </name>
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author">
     <name>
      <surname>Çiftçi</surname>
      <given-names>Gülşah</given-names>
     </name>
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group>
   <aff id="aff1">
    <institution>Cumhuriyet University</institution>
   </aff>
   <pub-date date-type="pub">
    <day>08</day>
    <month>12</month>
    <year>2017</year>
   </pub-date>
   <volume>1</volume>
   <fpage>65</fpage>
   <lpage>71</lpage>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>© 2017 SET Technology</copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>2017</copyright-year>
    <copyright-holder>SET Technology</copyright-holder>
    <license xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
     <license-p>CC BY 4.0</license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    <p>Nowadays new applications and new web sites are being developed, better methods and tools are needed in order to be able to develop web or mobile applications in a fast and interactive way with minimal code structure. In this point, both the design of the applications developed and the structure of the programming language it is coded are important. For webbased applications, Javascript frameworks provide simple, yet functional, look and feel of the page's html structure, resulting in faster results for applications. In addition, it allows to develop interactive elements of the user interface. The main purpose of this work is to compare the performance of platforms between different platforms on some frameworks such as ExtJS, SenchaTouch, Angular.js, React.js, and the usability tests of the designed interfaces by using different testing tools (Optimal Workshop , Visual Website Optimizer), and to provide developers with information that will enable them to be inferred based on data obtained from both design and coding  </p>
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group xml:lang="en">
    <kwd>User-focused design, user testing, usability testing, experimental user testing, user events, user tracking, usability testing tools, mobile and web applications</kwd>
   </kwd-group>
   <kwd-group xml:lang="en">
    <kwd>User-focused design, user testing, usability testing, experimental user testing, user events, user tracking, usability testing tools, mobile and web applications</kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <back>
  <ref-list>
   <ref id="ref1">
    <mixed-citation>Bastien, JM Christian. &quot;Usability testing: a review of some methodological and technical aspects of the method.&quot; International journal of medical informatics 79.4 (2010): e18-e23.&#13;
&#13;
Coursaris, Constantinos K., and Dan J. Kim. &quot;A metaanalytical review of empirical mobile usability studies.&quot; Journal of usability studies 6.3 (2011): 117-171.&#13;
&#13;
Dumas JS. User-based evaluations. In: Jacko JA, Sears A, editors. The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates; 2003, p. 1093-1117.&#13;
&#13;
J.M. Christian Bastien, “Usability Testing Some Current Practices and Research Questions” UFR Sciences Humaines &amp; Arts 57006 Metz, France Klaus Hinum, Human centred Design for Graphical User Interfaces. Dieselgasse 5a/13 A-1100 Vienna Austria&#13;
&#13;
Myers, Brad A., and Mary Beth Rosson. &quot;Survey on user interface programming.&quot; Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 1992.&#13;
&#13;
Rosenbaum S, Rohn JA, Humburg J. A toolkit for strategic usability: results from workshops, panels, and surveys. In: Little R, Nigay L, editors. Proceedings of the ACM CHI 2000 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press; 2000, p. 337-344.&#13;
&#13;
Spool J, Schroeder W. Testing Web sites: five users is nowhere near enough. In: Proceedings of the Conference extended abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI'2001. New York: ACM Press; 2001.&#13;
&#13;
Tullis T, Albert B. Measuring the user experience. Amsterdam: Morgan Kauffman; 2008.</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>
